The Baltic Sea in recent years has become a place where everything converges: climate goals, economic ambitions, environmental protection, fishing, shipping, and – more and more – security. Offshore wind energy for Latvia is not just a story about “green” electricity. It is a choice about what kind of Baltic Sea we want to see: will it be a space for our energy independence, security, and innovation, or a territory of disputes, concerns, and uncertainty.
According to the latest insights from the LIAA survey, conducted in February in collaboration with the sociological research firm "Norstat," there is already a solid foundation for a conversation on offshore wind energy development. A convincing majority (70%) of the Latvian public considers the sea a suitable location for wind parks, and national energy independence remains a top priority (84%). In fact, the key question is no longer whether wind energy is beneficial, but rather: how can we implement it safely and intelligently – ensuring that both coastal residents and the country as a whole benefit from it?
Professionals also revisit this ‘how’ once a year in dedicated discussions – for example, in the program of the ‘WindWorks 2026’ conference, the security dimension was highlighted very explicitly: how to protect critical energy infrastructure in the Baltics and what to expect in terms of cybersecurity threats.
At Sea, We’re Building More Than Turbines — We’re Building Critical Infrastructure
The upcoming Latvian-Estonian joint project – the offshore wind park ELWIND – is not an isolated object. It will become part of a system consisting of subsea cables, substations, communication solutions, maritime traffic safety monitoring, remote control, data exchange, and many other components. In other words, it is a network of critical infrastructure whose vulnerability in Europe has, in recent years, become an open and publicly acknowledged fact.
That is precisely why tangible steps have already been taken at the European level to treat underwater infrastructure not merely as an engineering solution, but also as a significant security issue. In 2024, the European Commission published recommendations on the security of submarine cables, emphasizing coordination, governance, and funding measures to mitigate risks to these connections that are vital for global communications. Meanwhile, in 2023, NATO established the Critical Undersea Infrastructure Coordination Cell to strengthen cooperation with industry, promote the exchange of best practices, and enhance defense capabilities.
Security is not an abstract concept in Latvia either. In April 2024, the energy ministers of eight Baltic Sea countries agreed on the Vilnius Declaration, which provides for closer cooperation in strengthening the security of critical offshore energy infrastructure. This agreement was reached at a time when concerns in the region had increased over attacks and acts of sabotage, which have highlighted the vulnerability of infrastructure.
In the current context of geopolitical tension, energy security has shifted from a theoretical concept to a matter of everyday costs and resilience. Even minor disruptions in supply chains are enough for global price increases to impact inflation in Latvia. This is clearly reflected in the recent situation in the oil market. Crude oil prices have risen, while the European gas market remains volatile. In the event of unpredictable developments, imported fuel quickly becomes a significant risk to household budgets. Under these conditions, electrification and domestic renewable energy sources take on strategic importance. The greater the share of consumption that can be shifted to electricity, and the more of it we produce ourselves (using wind, solar, and other renewable resources), the less dependent we are on external disruptions, and the more stable and predictable energy bills become.
How does wind energy fit into this context? Excessive dependence on a limited number of electricity sources is a significant risk we cannot afford. Wind energy enables diversification of the energy production structure; therefore, security and maritime spatial planning dimensions must be integrated from the very beginning of a project, rather than added later as an afterthought. When designing such facilities, potential incident scenarios and response plans must be anticipated in advance, cybersecurity requirements should be included as a mandatory technical baseline, and maritime spatial planning must be carried out in a way that balances security and defense interests with the needs of energy, fisheries, and environmental protection. With this approach, the ELWIND offshore wind park can become a reliable and resilient part of critical infrastructure.
Offshore wind and new opportunities for the coastal economy
Job creation, the development of local businesses, investments in infrastructure, as well as growth in science and research are among the most frequently cited benefits of offshore wind energy. Although approximately 70% of the population considers the sea a suitable location for wind farm development, questions still persist within society regarding their potential impact on the landscape, biodiversity, and restrictions on fishing, kitesurfing, and shipping. Often, people’s perceptions are dominated by the image of wind turbines alone, rather than the broader scope of economic activity and overall benefits they can bring.
The development of offshore wind creates opportunities for the emergence of new coastal industries and competencies. It encompasses a wide range of maritime-related activities –from energy production to the use of water resources and coastal tourism – while simultaneously fostering the development of new technologies, skills, and services. From this perspective, offshore wind can become a significant platform that generates new jobs in coastal areas and promotes the emergence of innovation.
In Europe, this 'platform' approach is increasingly manifesting as multi-functional solutions, for example, seaweed farming within wind farm territories. In the Netherlands, as part of the 'North Sea Farmers' project at the 'Hollandse Kust Zuid' wind farm, located approximately 18 kilometers offshore, commercial-scale seaweed cultivation has been established, while simultaneously researching biodiversity and carbon sequestration opportunities. Meanwhile, the 'Ecowende' wind farm developed in the Netherlands is being created as one of the most environmentally friendly projects of its kind, where all activities and technical solutions are aligned with nature conservation principles.
These examples lead to a vital conclusion: a wind park is not a closed or restrictive zone – it can become a space for innovation where research, new services, and coastal entrepreneurship develop simultaneously. In fact, it is part of the solution for preserving local communities and encouraging the younger generation to choose life on the coast. For Latvia, this perspective is particularly significant, as it offers coastal cities and ports the opportunity to transform from infrastructure peripheries into regional centers of competence. In practice, harnessing offshore wind energy means strengthening port capacities, developing logistics, vessel servicing, cable infrastructure, service and repair bases, as well as training opportunities. If this phase is not developed, the greatest added value flows elsewhere. Conversely, by developing it, coastal residents gain new jobs, knowledge, and business opportunities.
Coexistence at sea
The previously mentioned survey shows that public awareness in Latvia about wind park initiatives and energy security issues is gradually increasing; however, a large part of society still remains at the level of “I have heard about it” or “hard to say.” This lack of information creates fertile ground for rumors, resistance, and politically motivated fluctuations during pre-election periods.
If we want to build an inspiring yet honest narrative, we must state clearly: the offshore wind park ELWIND in Latvia will only be successful if it is implemented simultaneously as a project of security, economic development, and public trust. To achieve this, simple and understandable principles are needed – fewer general slogans and more clear answers on the essentials: where the project will be implemented, why specifically there, what the benefits and risks will be, what compensation and benefit-sharing mechanisms are planned, and how nature and security protection will be ensured.
Communication should follow an approach in which coastal residents are perceived as beneficiaries rather than obstacles. Latvia’s task is not to prove that wind energy is good – Latvia’s task is to demonstrate that it can be implemented safely, with added value for the economy, and through a process that the public can trust.